当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. R. Soc. N. Z. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Negotiating risks and responsibilities during lockdown: ethical reasoning and affective experience in Aotearoa New Zealand
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-13 , DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2020.1865417
Susanna Trnka 1 , Nicholas J. Long 2 , Pounamu Jade Aikman 3 , Nayantara Sheoran Appleton 4 , Sharyn Graham Davies 5, 6 , Antje Deckert 5 , Edmond Fehoko 5 , Eleanor Holroyd 7 , Naseem Jivraj 2 , Megan Laws 2 , Nelly Martin-Anatias 5 , Michael Roguski 8 , Nikita Simpson 2 , Rogena Sterling 9 , Laumua Tunufa’i 5
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Over forty-nine days of Level 4 and Level 3 lockdown, residents of Aotearoa New Zealand were subject to ‘stay home’ regulations that restricted physical contact to members of the same social ‘bubble’. This article examines their moral decision-making and affective experiences of lockdown, especially when faced with competing responsibilities to adhere to public health regulations, but also to care for themselves or provide support to people outside their bubbles. Our respondents engaged in independent risk assessment, weighing up how best to uphold the ‘spirit’ of the lockdown even when contravening lockdown regulations; their decisions could, however, lead to acute social rifts. Some respondents – such as those in flatshares and shared childcare arrangements – recounted feeling disempowered from participating in the collective management of risk and responsibility within their bubbles, while essential workers found that anxieties about their workplace exposure to the coronavirus could prevent them from expanding their bubbles in ways they might have liked. The inability to adequately care for oneself or for others thus emerges as a crucial axis of disadvantage, specific to times of lockdown. Policy recommendations regarding lockdown regulations are provided.



中文翻译:

锁定期间谈判风险和责任:新西兰奥特罗阿的道德推理和情感经验

摘要

在第4级和第3级锁定的四十九天中,新西兰Aotearoa的居民受到“住家”规定的约束,该规定将身体接触仅限于同一社交“泡沫”的成员。本文探讨了他们的道德决策和封锁的情感体验,特别是在面对竞争责任时要遵守公共卫生法规,同时还要关爱自己或为泡沫之外的人们提供支持。我们的受访者进行了独立的风险评估,权衡了即使在违反锁定规定的情况下如何最好地保持锁定的“精神”;然而,他们的决定可能导致严重的社会分歧。一些受访者(如那些在公寓和共享托儿服务中的受访者)说,自己被剥夺了参与泡泡内部风险和责任的集体管理的能力,而基本工作者发现,他们对工作场所暴露于冠状病毒的焦虑会阻止他们扩大泡泡以他们可能喜欢的方式。因此,无法充分照顾自己或他人便成为不利条件的关键轴,这是锁定时间所特有的。提供了有关锁定规则的政策建议。因此,无法充分照顾自己或他人便成为不利条件的关键轴,这是锁定时间所特有的。提供了有关锁定规则的政策建议。因此,无法充分照顾自己或他人便成为不利条件的关键轴,这是锁定时间所特有的。提供了有关锁定规则的政策建议。

更新日期:2021-01-13
down
wechat
bug