当前位置: X-MOL 学术Analysis › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Strict propriety is weak
Analysis Pub Date : 2021-05-05 , DOI: 10.1093/analys/anaa001
Catrin Campbell-Moore 1 , Benjamin A Levinstein 2
Affiliation  

Considerations of accuracy – the epistemic good of having credences close to truth-values – have led to the justification of a host of epistemic norms. These arguments rely on specific ways of measuring accuracy. In particular, the accuracy measure should be strictly proper. However, the main argument for strict propriety supports only weak propriety. But strict propriety follows from weak propriety given strict truth directedness (which is non-negotiable) and additivity (which is both very common and plausible). So no further argument is necessary.

中文翻译:

严格的礼节薄弱

准确性的考虑(即具有接近真值的信任度的认知优势)导致了许多认知规范的合理性。这些论据依赖于测量准确性的特定方法。特别是,精度度量应严格正确。但是,严格礼节的主要论点仅支持弱礼节。但是严格的礼节源于薄弱的礼节,这要归功于严格的真理指导(不可商量)和可加性(这是非常普遍和合理的)。因此,没有进一步的论点是必要的。
更新日期:2021-05-07
down
wechat
bug