This article deals with the effect of the Brussels I Regulation on arbitration. This Regulation no longer applies in the UK, but the British Government has applied to join the Lugano Convention, which contains similar provisions. So the article also discusses the position under Lugano, paying particular attention to the differences between the two instruments. The main focus is on the problems that arise when the same dispute is subject to both arbitration and litigation. Possible mechanisms to resolve these problems – such as antisuit injunctions – are considered. The article also discusses other questions, such as freezing orders in support of arbitration.

中文翻译：

---

仲裁和《布鲁塞尔一世条例》-英国脱欧前后

本文涉及《布鲁塞尔一号条例》对仲裁的影响。该法规在英国不再适用，但英国政府已申请加入《卢加诺公约》，该公约包含类似条款。因此，本文还讨论了卢加诺下的立场，尤其要注意这两种工具之间的区别。主要焦点是在同一争议同时受到仲裁和诉讼的情况下出现的问题。考虑了解决这些问题的可能机制，例如反诉讼禁令。本文还讨论了其他问题，例如冻结订单以支持仲裁。