Legal contexts frequently impose steep communication barriers, but because the law’s ontological framework of communication views it as an atomized, transaction phenomenon, the law lacks the ability to conceptualize and describe the way in which it itself imposes systemic communication burden. To overcome this shortcoming, this article presents a model for a systemic analysis of communication within the law. Part One operationalizes a set of cognitive-communication resources necessary to navigate communication in legal contexts. Part Two uses the operational model to illustrate how systemic elements of the law pressure the cognitive resources that underlie communication. Finally, Part Three uses the model to predict how possible systemic interventions might improve communication outcomes by alleviating or reducing systemic communication burdens. Not only does this article provide a conceptual tool to articulate the law’s systemic impacts on communication, the subsequent analysis offers a framework for exploring interventions that could ultimately lead to better outcomes for persons, particularly vulnerable or at-risk persons, who must navigate legal contexts. By changing how it conceptualizes communication and working to modify the communication dynamics that it itself perpetuates, the law can reduce the weight of the communication burdens that it imposes on the people within it.

中文翻译：

---

认知交流和法律：系统性风险和系统性干预的模型

法律环境经常施加严重的沟通障碍，但由于法律的沟通本体论框架将其视为原子化的交易现象，法律缺乏概念化和描述其自身施加系统性沟通负担的方式的能力。为了克服这个缺点，本文提出了一个对法律范围内的沟通进行系统分析的模型。第一部分操作了一组在法律环境中导航沟通所必需的认知沟通资源。第二部分使用操作模型来说明法律的系统性要素如何对构成沟通基础的认知资源施加压力。最后，第三部分使用该模型来预测可能的系统性干预措施如何通过减轻或减少系统性沟通负担来改善沟通结果。本文不仅提供了一个概念工具来阐明法律对沟通的系统性影响，随后的分析还提供了一个框架来探索干预措施，这些干预措施最终可能为那些必须在法律背景下驾驭的人，特别是弱势或高危人群带来更好的结果. 通过改变它对沟通的概念化方式，并努力改变它本身延续的沟通动态，法律可以减轻它强加给其中的人们的沟通负担。谁必须驾驭法律环境。通过改变它对沟通的概念化方式，并努力改变它本身延续的沟通动态，法律可以减轻它强加给其中的人们的沟通负担。谁必须驾驭法律环境。通过改变它对沟通的概念化方式，并努力改变它本身延续的沟通动态，法律可以减轻它强加给其中的人们的沟通负担。