Errata for Rockweit, J. T., A. B. Franklin, and P. C. Carlson. 2017. Differential impacts of wildfire on the population dynamics of an old-forest species. Ecology 98:1574–1582. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1805

In Rockweit et al. the authors stated “Our data was not confounded with salvage logging because post-fire salvage logging did not occur in our study area.” However, the authors report it has recently come to their attention that some post-fire salvage logging occurred in five of the 24 (20.8%) burned territories used in the analysis. The area salvage logged comprised <5% of the analysis area in four of the five impacted territories. In the fifth territory, Indian Valley Creek, ~25% of the analysis area was salvage-logged. The authors report that removal of the data from this territory did not alter the core finding of a negative relationship between apparent survival of spotted owls and increasing amounts of higher severity wildfire.

Rockweit、JT、AB Franklin 和 PC Carlson 的勘误表。2017. 野火对古老森林物种种群动态的不同影响。生态学98：1574-1582。doi：10.1002/ecy.1805

在 Rockweit 等人中。作者说：“我们的数据没有与救助伐木混淆，因为我们的研究区域没有发生火灾后救助伐木。” 然而，作者报告说，他们最近注意到，在分析中使用的 24 个 (20.8%) 被烧毁区域中有五个发生了火灾后的抢救性伐木。在五个受影响地区中的四个地区，已记录的区域打捞面积小于分析面积的 5%。在第五个领土，印第安谷溪，大约 25% 的分析区域是打捞采伐的。作者报告说，从该地区删除数据并没有改变核心发现，即斑点猫头鹰的明显存活率与严重程度更高的野火数量增加之间存在负相关关系。