当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Hous. Built. Environ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment ( IF 2.033 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-04 , DOI: 10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8
Şule Eryürük , Fatma Kürüm Varolgüneş , Sadık Varolgüneş

It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process.



中文翻译:

评估利益相关者的满意度作为改善建筑设计质量的添加剂:基于AHP的方法

通过评估反映建筑生产过程中各种意见的多维标准,可以获得更好,合格且无差错的结构。利益相关者的整合在完成评估过程中扮演着重要角色,该评估期望建筑生产达到目标质量,并且各种类型的利益相关者可以定义不同的优先级。因此,在将建筑生产过程的涉众包括在内的情况下,应使用适用的方法来确定标准的优先级。所考虑的所有标准均应规定,在创建新建筑和建成环境时,要满足需求和期望的所有方面。在这项研究中,这是一种广泛使用的多准则决策方法,用于确保决策者和受益者在施工过程中的相互满意。通过将“绿色和可持续性问题”添加到维特鲁威为建筑质量发展确定的“功能”,“建筑质量”和“影响”三部曲中,确定了四个主要标准和与这些主要标准相关的子标准。此处使用的方法基于一个评估系统,考虑了所有利益相关者的表达方式。从三种类型的利益相关者那里收集了必要的数据。一个由五个人组成的技术团队,由建筑师和工程师组成,一个由十二个人组成的焦点小组,由占领者组成的大规模住房客户,最后一个是由建筑生产公司的三个人组成的焦点小组,担任设施经理。据观察,不同类型的利益相关者对每个主要和次要标准的权重进行了不同的排序。因此,得出的结论是,标准的定义和权重的确定不应仅由一个项目的利益相关者来决定,而且在计划和应用过程中还应包括所有特定的利益相关者。

更新日期:2021-05-04
down
wechat
bug