Pronatalism is the belief system that encourages parenthood and reproduction, supporting the notion that a woman’s value is rooted in her ability to give birth to and parent children. Pronatalist expectations are disproportionately applied to high-status women in the United States, prescribing not only that women are supposed to reproduce, but which women are supposed to reproduce. Those who deviate from this hegemonic idea of a prototypical mother may disproportionately encounter antinatalist norms that prescribe that they should not bear or parent children. In the present article, I advocate for an intersectional psychological study of reproductive norms across the natalism spectrum, grounded in interdisciplinary insights and an understanding of systems of power and oppression. I discuss three common areas of interdisciplinary research related to reproductive norms: (a) pronatalism as a limit to women’s freedom, (b) racism and the control of Black women’s reproduction, and (c) queer perspectives on reproduction. Informed by intersectionality and stigma frameworks, I propose a generative model and six research questions that serve as a research agenda for the psychological study of reproductive norms across the natalism spectrum.

pronatalism是一种鼓励生育和生育的信念体系，支持着这样的观念，即女性的价值根植于她的生育能力和亲子能力。Pronatalist预期不成比例地应用于高地位的女性在美国，不仅规定是女人应该重现，但它的女性都应该再现。那些偏离了原型母亲这种霸权主义观念的人可能会不成比例地遇到反对新生儿主义者的规范，这些规范规定他们不应该这样做。熊或父母的孩子。在本文中，我主张对跨性别观念的生殖规范进行交叉心理学研究，其基础是跨学科的见解以及对权力和压迫系统的理解。我讨论了与生殖规范有关的跨学科研究的三个共同领域：（a）产前主义是对妇女自由的限制；（b）种族主义和对黑人妇女生殖的控制，以及（c）对生殖的看法很奇怪。在交叉性和污名化框架的指导下，我提出了一个生成模型和六个研究问题，作为横跨纳粹主义的生殖规范的心理学研究的研究议程。