The purpose of this article is to illuminate certain lines and layers of readings and rereadings – specifically running from Jewish philosopher Henri Bergson (1859–1941) through Catholic poet Charles Péguy (1873–1914) to Hans Urs von Balthasar – to suggest that certain fundamental ressourcement concepts of tradition and history are conditioned constitutionally by Bergsonian metaphysics, epistemology and theories of time. Péguy’s final, recently translated texts ‘Note sur M. Bergson et la Philosophie Bergsonienne’ (1914) and ‘Note Conjointe sur M Descartes et la Philosophie Cartésienne’ (1924) will be prioritized. Finally, this study considers distinct methodological differences within the field of theology regarding the status of history and its capacity to speak – and how – to contemporary theological concerns.

中文翻译：

---

记忆很重要：资源神学欠亨利柏格森的债

本文的目的是阐明阅读和重读的某些线条和层次——特别是从犹太哲学家亨利·伯格森（Henri Bergson，1859-1941）到天主教诗人查尔斯·佩吉（1873-1914）再到汉斯·乌尔斯·冯·巴尔塔萨（Hans Urs von Balthasar）资源配置传统和历史的概念在宪法上受到柏格森形而上学、认识论和时间理论的制约。Péguy 最近翻译的最后文本“Note sur M. Bergson et la Philosophie Bergsonienne”（1914）和“Note Conjointe sur M Descartes et la Philosophie Cartésienne”（1924）将被优先考虑。最后，本研究考虑了神学领域内关于历史地位及其对当代神学关注的说话能力和方式的明显方法论差异。