This paper sets out from the hypothesis that the embodied competences and expertise which characterise dance and sports activities have the potential to constructively challenge and inform phenomenological thinking. While pathological cases present experiences connected to tangible bodily deviations, the specialised movement practices of dancers and athletes present experiences which put our everyday experiences of being a moving body into perspective in a slightly different sense. These specialised experiences present factual variations of how moving, sensing and interacting can be like for us as body-subjects. To use of these sources inevitably demands that qualitative research methodologies – especially short-term ethnographical fieldwork – form part of the research strategy and qualify the way the researcher involves a second-person perspective when interviewing dancers and athletes about their experiences. In the subsequent phases analysing the data generated, I argue that researchers first strive to achieve internal consistency of empirical themes identified in the case of movement practices in question thus keeping to a contextualised and lived perspective, also denoted as an emic perspective. In subsequent phases phenomenological insights are then actively engaged in the exploration and discussion of the possible transcendental structures making the described subjective experiences possible. The specialised and context-defined experiences of ‘what a moving body can be like’ are accordingly involved as factual variations to constructively add to and potentially challenge phenomenological descriptions. Lastly, I exemplify how actual research strategies have been enacted in a variety of projects involving professional dancers’, golfers’ and sports dancers’ practices and experiences, respectively.

本文从这样的假设出发，即体现舞蹈和体育活动的内在能力和专业知识具有建设性地挑战和启发现象学思维的潜力。病理案例提供与明显身体偏差有关的经验，而舞者和运动员的专门动作实践则提供了经验，这些经验使我们作为运动体的日常经验在某种意义上有所不同。这些专业经验呈现出事实差异运动，感知和互动对我们来说就像身体对象一样。要利用这些资源，不可避免地要求定性研究方法，特别是短期人种志田野调查，应成为研究策略的一部分，并在与舞蹈演员和运动员进行有关访谈时，限定研究人员以第二人称视角进行研究的方式。在随后的阶段中，在分析生成的数据的过程中，我认为研究人员首先努力实现在所讨论的运动实践中确定的经验主题的内部一致性，从而保持语境化和鲜活的观点，也称为主观观点。在随后的阶段中，现象学的见解随后将积极地参与对可能的先验结构的探索和讨论，从而使所描述的主观体验成为可能。因此，涉及到“运动物体可能是什么样”的专业化和上下文定义的经验，作为事实性的变化，以建设性地添加和潜在地挑战现象学的描述。最后，我举例说明在各种项目中如何制定实际的研究策略，这些项目分别涉及职业舞者，高尔夫球手和体育舞者的做法和经验。