My effort to address the comments made by the two distinguished scholars (to “negate their negations” as it were), consists of three steps. I will start with a brief resume of Hegel’s dialectical logic, to provide a scaffold for the debate. Subsequently, I will address the comments made. In the case of Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, I will focus on his reference to Althusser. In the case of Bart Gremmen, I will focus on the dialectics of biology (on biology as an inherently dialectical science), notably on his reference to Mendel. Finally, I will address the tension between the conceptual and the empirical dimension of philosophical scholarship.

我要解决两位杰出学者的评论（实际上是“否定他们的否定”）的工作包括三个步骤。首先，我将简要介绍黑格尔的辩证逻辑，为辩论提供一个支撑。随后，我将谈谈所发表的意见。对于汉斯·约格·莱茵伯格（Hans-JörgRheinberger），我将重点介绍他对阿尔都塞的提法。就巴特·格莱门（Bart Gremmen）而言，我将专注于生物学的辩证法（将生物学作为一种固有的辩证科学），尤其是他对孟德尔的论述。最后，我将解决哲学学术的概念层面和经验层面之间的矛盾。