Demand-side management (DSM) in industrial facilities provides an opportunity for substantial amounts of energy cost savings, since industrial facilities are the largest energy consuming sectors globally. In this work, energy storage (ES) technologies are critically reviewed and compared with industrial DSM in mind. ES technologies reviewed herein include lithium-ion battery energy storage (BES), sodium-sulfur BES, lead-acid BES, flow BES, supercapacitor ES, superconducting magnetic ES, thermal ES, flywheel ES, pumped hydro ES, and compressed air ES. The fundamentals of these energy storage technologies are reviewed in detail including recent developments, followed by case studies and extensive comparisons. These comparisons include, but are not limited to cost per cycle analyses, levelized cost of energy analyses, and comparisons between performance, transient, and cost characteristics. Some key properties analyzed include the rated power, power density, efficiency, lifetime, discharge time, capital costs, and O&M costs.

由于工业设施是全球最大的能源消耗部门，因此工业设施中的需求方管理（DSM）为节省大量能源成本提供了机会。在这项工作中，对储能（ES）技术进行了严格审查，并与工业DSM进行了比较。本文回顾的ES技术包括锂离子电池储能（BES），钠硫BES，铅酸BES，流动BES，超级电容器ES，超导磁性ES，热ES，飞轮ES，抽水式ES和压缩空气ES。对这些储能技术的基本原理进行了详细的回顾，包括最近的发展，然后进行案例研究和广泛的比较。这些比较包括但不限于每周期分析成本，能源分析的平均成本，以及性能，瞬态和成本特征之间的比较。分析的一些关键属性包括额定功率，功率密度，效率，寿命，放电时间，资金成本和运行维护成本。