当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Studies Perspectives › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The South in “Global IR”: Worlding Beyond the “Non-West” in the Case of Brazil
International Studies Perspectives ( IF 2.667 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-24 , DOI: 10.1093/isp/ekz029
Peter Marcus Kristensen 1
Affiliation  

Abstract
As international relations has started to grapple with its geo-cultural parochialism, the focus has been on its “Western-centrism” and on how “non-Western” international relations might be different. This article argues that attempts to deprovincialize “Western” (i.e., Euro-American) international thought do not always revolve around “non-Westernness,” a negation with often cultural-civilizational connotations, but also deploy a North/South worlding that is more bound up with imperial-colonial experience and a “peripheral” concern with economic insertion into the core. Based on interviews with scholars, diplomats, and foreign policy intellectuals in Brazil, the paper explores the different ways “the South” is deployed—as (post)colonial subjectivity, as problematique, as relation, as outside, and as political move—to provide an alternative intervention into the debate on “Global IR.”


中文翻译:

“全球关系”中的南方:以巴西为例,超越“非西方”

摘要
随着国际关系开始努力应对其地缘文化的狭och主义,人们的注意力一直集中在其“西方中心主义”以及“非西方”国际关系可能如何与众不同的方面。本文认为,试图取消对“西方”(即欧美)国际思想的排他性化的尝试并不总是围绕“非西方性”(一种常常带有文化文明内涵的否定),但也存在着更多的北/南世界。与帝国殖民经验和对经济融入核心领域的“外围”关注紧密联系在一起。基于对巴西学者,外交官和外交政策知识分子的访谈,本文探讨了“南方”的不同部署方式-殖民地主观性,问题性,关系性,外部性,后殖民性。
更新日期:2020-03-24
down
wechat
bug