Evidence-based interventions are the standard for school psychology practice. Yet, how do professionals know when research scope, relevance, transparency, and quality are ready for real-world application? There remain questions as to exactly how these core concepts of evidence-based practices (EBPs) are realized. A discussion on whether psychological science can be relied on to deliver real-world practices related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led IJzerman and colleagues to develop a rubric to evaluate research for real-world application called evidence readiness level. This model is adapted for school psychologists' use in evaluating and implementing research for clinical practice. Clinical readiness level is a rubric that is designed to narrow the research-to-practice gap, provide criteria for EBPs, and specify the value of a scientist-practitioner model of school psychology.

中文翻译：

---

证据何时足以支持现实世界的应用？循证实践、开放科学、临床准备水平

循证干预是学校心理学实践的标准。然而，专业人士如何知道研究范围、相关性、透明度和质量何时可以用于实际应用？关于这些循证实践 (EBP) 的核心概念究竟是如何实现的，仍然存在问题。关于是否可以依靠心理科学来提供与冠状病毒 (COVID-19) 大流行相关的现实世界实践的讨论促使 IJzerman 及其同事开发了一个评估现实世界应用研究的标题，称为证据准备水平。该模型适用于学校心理学家在评估和实施临床实践研究时使用。临床准备水平是一个量规，旨在缩小研究与实践的差距，为 EBP 提供标准，