Bradley Onishi’s The Sacrality of the Secular: Postmodern Philosophy of Religion is more than a defense of philosophy of religion’s place in religious studies, or a neat history of continental philosophy of religion’s development out of questions posed by Max Weber and Martin Heidegger, or even an effort to rescue the subfield from the dismissive charge of crypto-theology. Rather, it is the testimony of a rapidly vanishing type of thinker: the philosopher who does not speak as theologian or on behalf of a church but nonetheless feels Christian heritage to be in some complicated way his own. At its best and most sincere, Onishi’s book is an effort to answer the question raised by his insider-outsider status (which is, as he notes, the same insider-outsider status religious studies as a whole shares). Namely, what can religion be for the non-believers who do not want to embrace disenchanted secularity but cannot embrace traditional religious metaphysics?

中文翻译：

---

世俗的圣祭

布拉德利·奥尼希（ Bradley Onishi）的《世俗的神圣性：后现代宗教哲学》不仅是为了捍卫宗教哲学在宗教研究中的地位，或是为了超越马克斯·韦伯和马丁·海德格尔提出的问题，对整个大陆宗教哲学的发展进行整洁的历史，甚至是为了使该子领域摆脱对加密货币的不屑一顾的指控。神学。相反，这是一种迅速消失的思想家的见证：这位哲学家虽然不以神学家的身份或以教堂的名义发言，但仍然觉得基督教遗产在某种程度上是他本人的。Onishi的书以其最好和最真诚的方式，试图回答由他的内部－外部地位所提出的问题（正如他所指出的那样，整个宗教研究具有相同的内部－外部地位）。即