The purpose of this article is to detect the lack of coincidence regarding foreign affairs in the electoral programs of the two members of the Spanish center-left coalition¹. The main assumption of this article is that the Socialist Party maintains its foreign affairs program, while Unidas Podemos, the coalition partner, does not because it focuses its priorities on other areas of its political agenda at the sacrifice of foreign policy. This article explores the tensions and resignations experienced in the field of foreign policy by the two government partners. It also explains how both political forces had to revise their proposals in order to allow the formation of a new government. This article hypothesizes that the resignations have been greater by Unidas Podemos, and that the Socialist Party has been able to maintain the core of its doctrine on foreign policy, security, and defense. The main challenge that this government will face in the upcoming months is the enlargement of the agreement between Spain and the United States regarding the establishment of the U.S. Army at the Spanish military bases of Rota and Morón. Regarding the methodology, we analyzed the top articles literature to compare the political action of several European coalition governments in developing its foreign affairs policy.

本文的目的是发现西班牙中左翼联盟¹的两名成员的选举计划中在外交事务上缺乏巧合¹。本文的主要假设是，社会党维持其外交事务计划，而联盟伙伴尤尼达斯·波德莫斯（Unidas Podemos）并非因为牺牲外交政策而将其优先重点放在其政治议程的其他领域。本文探讨了两国政府合作伙伴在外交政策领域所经历的紧张和辞职。它还解释了两个政治力量如何不得不修改其提议以允许组建新政府。本文假设，尤尼达斯·波德莫斯（Unidas Podemos）的辞职人数更大，而社会党能够维持其关于外交政策，安全与国防的学说的核心。本届政府在未来几个月将面临的主要挑战是扩大西班牙和美国之间关于在Rota和Morón的西班牙军事基地建立美军的协议。关于方法论，我们分析了热门文章文献，以比较几个欧洲联盟政府在制定其外交政策时的政治行动。