Feedback of neuropsychological test results to patients and family members include psychoeducation and implications for daily life. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the literature on neuropsychological feedback and to offer clinical recommendations. In accordance with formal scoping review methodology, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched. Studies were included if they reported on neuropsychological feedback, if full papers were available, and if they included human participants. All languages were included, and no limit was placed on the year of publication. Of the 2,173 records screened, 34 publications met the inclusion criteria. Five additional publications were included after cross-referencing. An update of the search led to the inclusion of two additional papers. Of these 41 publications, 26 were research papers. Neuropsychological feedback is provided for a wide spectrum of diagnoses and usually given in-person and has been related to optimal a positive effect on patient outcomes (e.g. increase the quality of life). Most papers reported on satisfaction and found that satisfaction with an NPA increased when useful feedback was provided. However, information retention was found to be low, but communication aids, such as written information, were found to be helpful in improving retention. The current review demonstrated the benefits of neuropsychological feedback and that this should be part of standard clinical procedures when conducting a neuropsychological assessment. Further research on the benefits of neuropsychological feedback and how to improve information provision would enrich the neuropsychological literature.

神经心理学测试结果对患者和家庭成员的反馈包括心理教育和对日常生活的影响。该范围审查旨在概述有关神经心理反馈的文献并提供临床建议。根据正式的范围界定审查方法，搜索了 PubMed、PsycInfo、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Embase 数据库。如果研究报告了神经心理反馈，是否有完整的论文，并且是否包括人类参与者，则纳入研究。所有语言都包括在内，出版年份没有限制。在筛选的 2,173 条记录中，有 34 篇出版物符合纳入标准。交叉引用后，还包括了另外五篇出版物。搜索的更新导致包含另外两篇论文。在这 41 篇出版物中，有 26 篇是研究论文。神经心理学反馈用于广泛的诊断，通常是亲自提供的，并且与对患者结果的最佳积极影响有关（例如提高生活质量）。大多数论文都报告了满意度，并发现当提供有用的反馈时，对 NPA 的满意度会增加。然而，人们发现信息保留率很低，但发现书面信息等交流辅助工具有助于提高保留率。目前的审查证明了神经心理学反馈的好处，并且在进行神经心理学评估时，这应该成为标准临床程序的一部分。