ABSTRACT

This essay is dedicated to Elliot Wolfson’s new book on Heidegger and Kabbalah. Wolfson’s project is read here as a philosophical reflection and scholarly intervention on the “and,” that is, on pluralism in thought. Wolfson juxtaposes Heideggerian and kabbalistic corpora as expressing the same conception of non-totalitarian, plural thought, and criticizes both Heidegger and Kabbalah for betraying this pluralism in their ethnocentric tendencies. As a scholarly “ethical corrective,” Wolfson indicates in both corpora a countermeasure: A Gnostic disengagement of thought from politics, in favor of poetics. The essay critiques this corrective by pointing at the different constellations of Gnosis and politics in Heidegger and Kabbalah.

摘要

本文是针对艾略特·沃尔夫森（Elliot Wolfson）关于海德格尔和卡巴拉的新书而写的。此处将Wolfson的项目视为对“和”（即思想上的多元化）的哲学反思和学术干预。沃尔夫森将海德格尔语和卡巴拉式语料库并置为表示非极权主义，多元思想的同一概念，并批评海德格尔和卡巴拉以民族为本的倾向背叛了这种多元化。作为学术上的“道德矫正”，沃尔夫森在两种语料库中都指出了一种对策：诺斯替克思想从政治上脱离政治，而赞成诗学。这篇文章通过指出海德格尔和卡巴拉的地精和政治的不同星座来批判这种纠正。