This article takes into consideration the importance of the concept of right to the city in Mexico City politics and raises three main questions: How have center-left governments adapted the concept according to their own interests, in a neoliberalizing context marked by mandatory repositioning of planning and capital? How has the right to the city been taken up and modified by diverse social organizations aimed at influencing the production of urban space? To what extent has the concept, despite manipulations and misunderstandings, proved to be politically useful in bridging differences between government agencies and social movements? I focus on the social life of the concept. I suggest that its widespread dissemination has not meant its trivialization. On the contrary, the concept has taken on greater sociological complexity. It was not turned into a fixed concept, rather it became both a field of contention and a tool enabling political encounters.

中文翻译：

---

城市权概念的挪用：墨西哥城的政治家、政治家和集体行动者☆

本文考虑了城市权概念在墨西哥城政治中的重要性，并提出了三个主要问题：在以强制重新定位规划为标志的新自由主义背景下，中左翼政府如何根据自身利益调整这一概念？和资本？旨在影响城市空间生产的各种社会组织如何接受和修改城市权？尽管存在操纵和误解，这一概念在多大程度上被证明在弥合政府机构和社会运动之间的分歧方面在政治上有用？我关注的是社会生活的概念。我认为它的广泛传播并不意味着它的微不足道。相反，这个概念具有更大的社会学复杂性。