Chile initiated a constitution-making process in late 2019, after the major political parties signed an agreement to respond to the massive demonstrations that took over the streets in October of 2019. Dominant trends in Chile and Latin America’s constitutional thought typically examine this type of process through the lenses of the constituent power or transformative constitutionalism. The authors of this essay offer a different view. They argue that Chile’s constitution-making process, as designed by the multiparty agreement, manifests a double aversion: to avoid the Bolivarian way of constitution-making—including its associated constituent power narrative—and to put an end to the institutional and symbolic legacy of the Pinochet regime. In attempting to stay clear of these two negative models, the authors argue that the rules of the constitution-making process have adopted the main features of the post-sovereign model of constitution-making.

中文翻译：

---

智利制宪过程的双重厌恶

在主要政党签署协议以应对 2019 年 10 月上街的大规模示威游行后，智利于 2019 年底启动了宪法制定进程。智利和拉丁美洲宪法思想的主导趋势通常会审视此类进程通过制宪权或变革性宪政的镜头。这篇文章的作者提出了不同的观点。他们认为，多党协议所设计的智利制宪过程表现出双重厌恶：避免玻利瓦尔的制宪方式——包括与之相关的制宪权力叙事——并结束宪法的制度性和象征性遗产。皮诺切特政权。为了避免这两种负面模式，