In this research, we discuss balancing two essential ecosystem services, known as resilience and yield, in a harvested two predators one prey system. We study how these two ecosystem services respond to different types of harvesting plans applied to the system. In individual harvesting, we observe that prey harvesting is suitable for generating more yield while either predator harvesting gives more resilience. Several patterns are possible based on the intensity of harvesting efforts applied to prey or the predator in simultaneous harvesting. This study shows that a balanced harvest between prey and predators may give more than the selective harvesting of any species yielding and stabilizing the ecosystem. Even if this fair strategy is not a cooperative situation for both resilience and yield, it may be the most favorable approach to scale those services. Finally, we may state that it would help us correlate the safest position (corresponds to the maximizing resilience yield) and the good views (which corresponds to the maximum sustainable return) to safeguard our ecosystems.

在这项研究中，我们讨论了在收获的两个捕食者和一个猎物系统之间平衡两种基本的生态系统服务，即复原力和产量。我们研究了这两种生态系统服务如何响应应用于系统的不同类型的收获计划。在个体收获中，我们观察到猎物收获适合产生更多的产量，而捕食者收获都可以提供更大的适应力。根据同时进行捕捞时对猎物或捕食者施加的捕捞努力的强度，有几种模式是可能的。这项研究表明，猎物和掠食者之间的平衡收获可能比选择性收获任何能够产生并稳定生态系统的物种更有益处。即使这种公平的策略对于恢复力和产量而言都不是一种合作的情况，这可能是扩展这些服务的最有利方法。最后，我们可能会说这将有助于我们将最安全的位置（对应于最大的回弹产量）与良好的观点（对应于最大的可持续回报）相关联，以保护我们的生态系统。