当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Historical Sociology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Indigenization of American Sociology in Japan: The Contribution of Kazuko Tsurumi
Journal of Historical Sociology ( IF 0.767 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-13 , DOI: 10.1111/johs.12320
Shujiro Yazawa

This paper is an investigation of attempts at endogenization and indigenization in the history of sociology in Japan. The author begins by presenting a short history of Japanese sociology. While the issues of endogenization and indigenization had been raised in the 1910s, imperialism and the militarization of the Emperor state and society blocked this form of development. Japanese social sciences have thus mainly followed the model of Western social sciences. The issue of indigenization gained attention after World War II and especially after the late 1960s, which was a time of reflection on the extreme influence of American sociology. In this context, this paper investigates the development of Kazuko Tsurumi’s sociology, which is one of the best examples of work that deals with the issue of indigenization. Tsurumi analyzes social change from pre‐World War II to post‐World War II Japan by drawing on sociological functionalism. However, Tsurumi suggests that Kunio Yanagita’s theory of folklore and ethnology provides a stronger explanatory framework than functionalism, and contends that Kumagusu Minaka has developed an approach rooted in East Asia. Tsurumi advances this indigenous development theory based on the work of Yanagita and Minakata, and at the same time internationalizes this theory. This paper concludes that Tsurumi’s theory is an important medium between Western sociology and Eastern sociology.

中文翻译:

日本美国社会学的本土化:鹤见和子的贡献

本文是对日本社会学史上内生化和本土化尝试的调查。作者首先介绍了日本社会学的简短历史。虽然在1910年代提出了内生化和本土化的问题,但帝国主义和皇帝国家和社会的军事化阻碍了这种发展形式。因此,日本社会科学主要遵循西方社会科学的模式。第二次世界大战后,尤其是在1960年代后期,本土化问题引起了人们的关注,那是反思美国社会学的极端影响的时期。在这种情况下,本文研究鹤见和子社会学的发展,这是处理本土化问题的最佳范例之一。鹤见通过社会功能主义分析了从第二次世界大战到第二次世界大战后的日本的社会变化。然而,鹤见建议柳田邦男的民俗学和民族学理论提供了比功能主义更强的解释框架,并认为熊谷康中已经发展了植根于东亚的方法。鹤见在柳田和Minakata的工作基础上推进了这一土著发展理论,同时使这一理论国际化。本文的结论是鹤见理论是介于西方社会学和东方社会学之间的重要媒介。并认为,熊谷Min中业已开发出一种植根于东亚的方法。鹤见在柳田和Minakata的工作基础上推进了这一土著发展理论,同时使这一理论国际化。本文的结论是鹤见理论是介于西方社会学和东方社会学之间的重要媒介。并认为,熊谷Min中业已开发出一种植根于东亚的方法。鹤见在柳田和Minakata的工作基础上推进了这一土著发展理论,同时使这一理论国际化。本文的结论是鹤见理论是介于西方社会学和东方社会学之间的重要媒介。
更新日期:2021-05-18
down
wechat
bug