当前位置: X-MOL 学术Review of Policy Research › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Corrigendum
Review of Policy Research ( IF 2.328 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-13 , DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12414


The authors regret that there were two typographical errors in the article “How to achieve a more resource efficient and climate neutral energy system by 2030? Views of Nordic stakeholders”, https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12347.

On page 13, Table 5 (“View 2 on Transport Solutions”), row 3 (“Vehicles using biofuels….”), column 2 (Rank), where “4” should have read “3”.

Table 5. View 2 on Transport Solutions
Statement Rank
The society must promote the use of electric vehicles not only as a solution to the energy problems of transport: they also help with directing loads and storing energy and can even function as reserve power solutions in homes. (29) (4)
The energy efficiency of the transport system must be improved by promoting the use of smart grids and electric vehicles. (35) (5)
Vehicles using biofuels compare unfavorably to electric vehicles, when the aim is to make the energy consumption of transportation more environmentally friendly. (42) (3)

Note:

  • (5) = most agree, (−5) = most disagree.

See the corrected table below.

On page 15, Table 8 (“View 3 on the Biofuel Debate”), row 2 (“Vehicles using biofuels…”), column 2 (Rank), where “4” should have read “‐4”.

Table 8. View 3 on the Biofuel Debate
Statement Rank
The use of forest‐based biomass in energy production must be increased. (8) (−1)
Vehicles using biofuels compare unfavorably to electric vehicles, when the aim is to make the energy consumption of transportation more environmentally friendly. (42) (−4)

Note:

  • (5) = most agree, (−5) = most disagree.

See the corrected table below.

The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.



中文翻译:

更正

作者感到遗憾的是,“如何在2030年之前实现资源效率更高和气候中和的能源系统?”一文中存在两个印刷错误。北欧利益相关者的观点”,https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12347。

在第13页的表5(“运输解决方案视图2”)第3行(“使用生物燃料的车辆...。”)的第2列(等级)中,“ 4”应读为“ 3”。

表5.关于运输解决方案的视图2
陈述
社会必须促进使用电动汽车,不仅是解决交通运输中的能源问题:它们还有助于指导负载和存储能量,甚至可以充当家庭的后备电源解决方案。(29) (4)
必须通过促进智能电网和电动汽车的使用来提高运输系统能源效率。(35) (5)
旨在使运输的能源消耗更加环保的目的是,使用生物燃料的汽车与电动汽车相比是不利的。(42) (3)

笔记:

  • (5)=最同意,(-5)=最不同意。

请参阅下面的更正表。

在第15页的表8(“生物燃料辩论视图3”)的第2行(“使用生物燃料的车辆...”)的第2列(等级)中,“ 4”应读为“ -4”。

表8.关于生物燃料辩论的观点3
陈述
必须增加在能源生产中使用森林生物质。(8) (-1)
旨在使运输的能源消耗更加环保的目的是,使用生物燃料的汽车与电动汽车相比是不利的。(42) (−4)

笔记:

  • (5)=最同意,(-5)=最不同意。

请参阅下面的更正表。

对于由此带来的任何不便,作者深表歉意。

更新日期:2021-04-13
down
wechat
bug