The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) now serves as a framework for research, among other activities, when it involves collecting and using data which directly or indirectly allow the people in question to be identified. This therefore affects our research practice and, we believe, requires collective discussion. We suggest opening up the debate in this article by looking at what GDPR compliance means for our work in concrete terms, based on our own experience beginning a study on family transmission of banal nationalism (the ETPAF project). We also give an account of how, in our case, this new regulatory situation has afforded us the opportunity to add a (small) popular education dimension (or participatory science) to our work that was not part of the initial project and that we consider genuinely stimulating.

现在，《通用数据保护条例》（GDPR）充当了研究的框架，其中涉及收集和使用直接或间接地允许识别相关人员的数据。因此，这影响了我们的研究实践，并且我们认为需要集体讨论。我们建议根据我们自己的经验，开始研究平庸民族主义的家庭传播（ETPAF项目），从具体的角度研究GDPR遵守对我们的工作意味着什么，从而在本文中展开辩论。我们还说明了在这种情况下，这种新的监管情况如何使我们有机会在我们的工作中增加一个（较小的）大众教育范畴（或参与性科学），而这并不是最初项目的一部分，我们考虑到这一点真正令人兴奋。