This response addresses the issues and potentialities raised by the commentaries on my article, ‘For Granular Geography’. It clarifies some of the tensions within my original presentation of granular geography, and then outlines two diverging trajectories for granular geographies to come. The first outlines a geophilosophical and geomorphological trajectory of granular assemblages that map how sand binds elemental and non-human relations to interrogate the emerging global sand crisis. The second trajectory consists of developing granular relations for the ecological critique of political economy as a set of tools for theorising unstable relations between capital and nature, complementing existing metaphors of metabolism.

此回复解决了我的文章“针对粒度地理学”的评论所提出的问题和潜力。它澄清了我最初介绍的粒状地理中的某些紧张关系，然后概述了粒状地理的两个不同轨迹。第一部分概述了颗粒组合的地球哲学和地貌轨迹，该轨迹描绘了沙子如何结合元素和非人类关系来审问正在出现的全球性沙子危机。第二条轨迹包括发展对政治经济学的生态批判的精细关系，作为理论上资本与自然之间不稳定关系，补充现有新陈代谢隐喻的一组工具。