The concept of accessibility as an element of the interaction between land use and transportation is widely applied in studies of urban mobility. The idea that the accessibility of a place can be measured by the variety and quantity of opportunities available at the destination has led to the creation and adaptation of various indicators. The new mode of transport known as ride hailing (RH) has grown in recent years throughout the world, making it necessary to evaluate its impact on modern society, mainly its interaction with other modes. Therefore, this article presents a method to calculate the accessibility of formal jobs generated by public transportation (PT) and RH, to compare the results. For this purpose, we made adaptations to two indicators commonly used in the literature: the Gini index combined with the Lorenz curve; and the location quotient (LQ). The integrated structure is demonstrated in the context of a case study conducted in four districts of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. By applying the proposed method, we found that in regions with high commercial concentration and number of jobs, with the fares charged in the city, the accessibility to formal jobs generated by RH is greater than that associated with PT when more than two passengers travel together. This information on the competition or complementarity of the two modes can be useful to make decisions for regulation of the transport sector in general, and ride hailing in particular.

作为土地利用和交通之间相互作用的要素之一，无障碍概念在城市交通研究中得到了广泛的应用。可以通过在目的地获得的机会的数量和数量来衡量一个地方的可访问性的想法导致了各种指标的创建和调整。近年来，在世界范围内发展了一种称为乘车大乘车（RH）的新运输方式，因此有必要评估其对现代社会的影响，主要是其与其他运输方式的相互作用。因此，本文提出了一种方法来计算由公共交通（PT）和RH产生的正式工作的可访问性，以比较结果。为此，我们对文献中常用的两个指标进行了调整：基尼系数与洛伦兹曲线相结合；以及 和位置商（LQ）。通过在巴西里约热内卢市的四个地区进行的案例研究证明了这种集成结构。通过应用所提出的方法，我们发现在商业集中度高和工作数量大的地区，在城市收取车费的情况下，当两个以上的乘客一起旅行时，由RH产生的正式工作的可及性比与PT相关的更大。有关两种模式的竞争或互补性的信息对于总体上对运输部门的监管做出决定，尤其是对乘车称呼而言，可能是有用的。我们发现，在商业集中度高和工作数量大的地区，按照城市的票价收费，当有两个以上的乘客一起旅行时，RH产生的正式工作的可及性比PT大。有关两种模式的竞争或互补性的信息对于总体上对运输部门的监管做出决定，尤其是对乘车称呼而言，可能是有用的。我们发现，在商业集中度高和工作数量大的地区，按照城市的票价收费，当有两个以上的乘客一起旅行时，RH产生的正式工作的可及性比PT大。有关两种模式的竞争性或互补性的信息对于总体上监管运输部门，尤其是乘搭冰雹的决策很有用。