ABSTRACT

In this excerpt, Vladimir S. Bibler attempts to show that the initial concepts of mechanics that were formulated in the 1660s are paradoxical; they result in contradictory concepts. However, this paradox was revealed only in the late twentieth century. When concepts turn to themselves in self-justification, paradoxes arise, as in the paradox of set theory. According to Bibler, the reason for this is the paradoxical nature of any theoretical system’s “beginnings,” because they border on preexisting and future “beginnings.” Bibler discusses the revealing of paradoxes in correlating the principles of Galileo and Kant, in the fact that Kant comprehended Galileo’s formulation of a new understanding of motion as inertial motion, which concealed contradictory determinations. He provides a definition of paradox in which a deduction completely refutes its own premises.

摘要

在此摘录中，弗拉基米尔·S·圣经查尔（Vladimir S. Bibler）试图证明1660年代提出的力学的最初概念是自相矛盾的。它们导致相互矛盾的概念。但是，这种悖论只是在二十世纪后期才被发现。当概念在自我证明中转向自己时，就会产生悖论，就像集合论的悖论一样。根据Bibler的说法，其原因是任何理论体系的“起点”都是自相矛盾的，因为它们与既有和未来的“起点”接壤。圣经学家讨论了与伽利略和康德原理相关的悖论的揭示，因为康德理解了伽利略对运动作为惯性运动的新理解的表述，这种运动掩盖了矛盾的决定。