ABSTRACT

Within a Learning and Teaching Support platform, Janis and Mann’s (1977). “Emergency Decision Making: A Theoretical Analysis of Responses to Disaster Warnings.” Journal of Human Stress 3 (2): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1977.9936085) model of decision making was used to examine relationships between people’s decisional styles, objective measurements of file use and the subsequent quality of their work. A total of 95 Undergraduate Psychology students consented to the monitoring of their online study behaviours, and completed the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire. Better online grades were linked to the general ability and better decisional self-esteem. Greater amounts of file access were associated with hypervigilance and more time spent online. The number of missed supplementary online quizzes was related to poorer decisional self-esteem, fewer files accessed online but less procrastination. While good decisional styles were associated with better quality outcomes, defective decisional styles can manifest online as greater file access or fewer tasks completed. An absence, inappropriate or an excess of online activity can indicate students are defensively avoidant or panicking and need assistance.

摘要

在学习和教学支持平台内，Janis and Mann's (1977)。“紧急决策：灾害警报响应的理论分析。” 人类压力杂志3（2）：35-48。https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1977.9936085) 决策模型用于检查人们的决策风格、文件使用的客观衡量标准和随后的工作质量之间的关系。共有 95 名本科心理学学生同意监测他们的在线学习行为，并完成了墨尔本决策问卷。更好的在线成绩与一般能力和更好的决策自尊有关。更多的文件访问与高度警惕和更多的在线时间有关。错过的补充在线测验的数量与较差的决策自尊、较少的在线访问文件但较少拖延有关。虽然良好的决策风格与更好的质量结果相关联，有缺陷的决策风格可以在网上表现为更多的文件访问或更少的任务完成。缺席、不适当或过多的在线活动可能表明学生在防御性回避或恐慌，需要帮助。