当前位置: X-MOL 学术Australian Journal of Public Administration › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Learning to learn from bushfire: Perspectives from Victorian emergency management practitioners
Australian Journal of Public Administration ( IF 2.140 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-08 , DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.12476
Graham Dwyer 1
Affiliation  

The Black Summer Fires of 2019/2020 remind us not only that Australia is arguably the most bushfire prone area in the world but also that we have much to learn in terms of how we learn from such events. Bushfires interact with emergency management systems in a manner that is complex and unpredictable which all too often results in damages and losses, so significant that governments establish public inquiries to forensically examine what happened and why afterwards. Too often, such processes have resulted in emergency management practitioners (EMP) being blamed, not to mention scapegoated and even vilified for damages and losses from major bushfire events. With recent bushfire events (as well as other crises surrounding Covid-19) highlighting the excruciating demands placed on EMP and an escalating scepticism about whether public inquiries improve preparation for future bushfires, this paper explores the question: what can we learn about public inquiries based on the experiences of EMP?

中文翻译:

学习从丛林大火中学习:维多利亚州应急管理从业者的观点

的二千○二十○分之二千○十九黑色夏季火灾提醒我们,不仅是澳大利亚可以说是最山火易发区在世界上也是,我们有很多的方面来学习如何我们从此类事件中吸取教训。丛林大火以一种复杂且不可预测的方式与应急管理系统相互作用,这往往会导致损害和损失,其重要性如此之大以至于政府建立了公众调查,以对发生的事情以及事后发生的原因进行法医检查。此类流程常常导致应急管理从业人员 (EMP) 受到指责,更不用说成为替罪羊,甚至因重大森林火灾事件造成的损害和损失而受到诽谤。随着最近的丛林大火事件(以及围绕 Covid-19 的其他危机)凸显了对 EMP 的严苛要求,以及人们对公众调查是否能改善未来丛林大火的准备工作的怀疑不断升级,本文探讨了一个问题:我们可以从基于公共调查的关于 EMP 的经验?
更新日期:2021-04-08
down
wechat
bug