Although counselor broaching of cultural identities and structural issues with clients is broadly supported by the counseling profession, how to do so most effectively has been debated. In this article, I identify core tenets, or commonalities, across the broaching literature and critically examine the debates about specific components of broaching practice. I define the term broaching and invite empirical tests of broaching components to begin a process of translating culturally responsive theory into an observable, evidence‐based skill set.

中文翻译：

---

“我想，但是怎么办？” 在核心原则和有争议的组件中定义顾问咨询

尽管辅导员向客户提出关于文化身份和结构性问题的辅导员得到了辅导专业的广泛支持，但如何有效地这样做却一直存在争议。在本文中，我确定了整个拉削文献的核心宗旨或共同点，并严格审查了关于拉削实践特定组成部分的辩论。我定义了拉削这个术语，并邀请对拉削组件的经验测试来开始将文化响应理论转化为可观察的，基于证据的技能的过程。