当前位置: X-MOL 学术Jurisprudence › 论文详情
Two questions for private law theory
Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2021-04-06 , DOI: 10.1080/20403313.2021.1908015
Felipe Jiménez

ABSTRACT

This article claims that private law theorists ought to bear in mind the distinction between wholesale questions about the best interpretation or justification of legal institutions, and retail questions about their internal operation – in other words, the distinction between questions about legal institutions and questions within them. This distinction has been obscured in part of recent private law theory, as recent discussions involving monism, pluralism, and private law adjudication show. The article explores these theoretical discussions and identifies some of their shortcomings. It also argues that, given the institutional character of private law, the distinction is plausible, and that – while it already underlies some contemporary discussions – it should be given much more salience, given the important contribution it could make to an adequate methodology in private law theory.



中文翻译:

私法理论的两个问题

摘要

本文主张,私法理论家应该牢记关于最佳解释或法律制度正当性的批发问题与有关其内部运作的零售问题之间的区别;换句话说,关于法律制度的问题与其中的内部问题之间的区别。正如最近有关一元论,多元论和私法裁决的讨论所显示的那样,这种区别在最近的私法理论中已被部分掩盖。本文探讨了这些理论讨论,并指出了它们的一些缺点。它还认为,鉴于私法的制度性,这种区分是合理的,并且尽管它已经成为当代讨论的基础,但应该给予更多的重视,

更新日期:2021-04-06
全部期刊列表>>
2021中国学者有奖调研
JACS
材料科学跨学科高质量前沿研究
中国作者高影响力研究精选
虚拟特刊
屿渡论文,编辑服务
何川
清华大学
郭维
上海中医药大学
华东师范大学
北京大学许言
楚甲祥
西湖石航
上海交大
北理工
隐藏1h前已浏览文章
课题组网站
新版X-MOL期刊搜索和高级搜索功能介绍
ACS材料视界
南开大学
张韶光
华辉
天合科研
x-mol收录
试剂库存
down
wechat
bug