Our increasingly diverse world of clinical practice and supervision necessitates clinical supervisors foster supervisees’ abilities to attend to clients’ cultural contexts, lenses, and frameworks (Patallo in Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(3), 227–232, 2019). Equally relevant is promoting clinicians’ own critique of accepted clinical practices (Hardin et al. in American Psychologist, 69(7), 656–668, 2014). Such a stance is now being referred to as embodying cultural humility. It is emerging as central to culturally responsive and competent clinical practice (Patallo in Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(3), 227–232, 2019). Clinical supervision provides one context for fostering cultural humility. Clinical supervision has historically been delivered in one to one or group formats. However, across the last twenty years, triadic supervision has slowly and consistently made inroads as a legitimate and effective form of clinical supervision (Stinchfield et al. in International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 32, 225–239, 2007). This paper will describe one such triadic supervision model, the Reflective Model of Triadic Supervision (RMTS, Kleist and Hill in: The reflective model of triadic supervision, 2003) as a viable model to foster the development of cultural humility in supervision.

我们日益多样化的临床实践和监督世界要求临床监督员要培养被监督者的能力，以照顾客户的文化背景，视角和框架（Patallo职业心理学培训和教育，13（3），227–232，2019年）。同样重要的是促进临床医生对公认的临床实践的批判（Hardin等人在American Psychologist，69（7），656–668，2014）。这种立场现在被称为体现了文化谦卑。它正在成为具有文化响应力和称职临床实践的中心（Patallo专业心理学培训和教育，13（3），227-232，2019年）。临床监督为培养文化谦卑提供了一种环境。历史上，临床监督是以一对一或小组形式进行的。然而，在过去的二十年中，三合会监督作为一种合法有效的临床监督形式，一直在缓慢而持续地介入（Stinchfield等人，《国际心理咨询杂志》 32，225–239​​，2007）。本文将描述一个这样的三元监督模型，即三元监督的反射模型（RMTS，Kleist和Hill，见：三元监督的反射模型，2003年），作为促进监督中文化谦逊发展的可行模型。