当前位置: X-MOL 学术The British Journal of Criminology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Consequences of judging in transitional justice courts
The British Journal of Criminology ( IF 3.288 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-23 , DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azab008
Hollie Nyseth Brehm 1 , Laura C Frizzell 1 , Christopher Uggen 2 , Evelyn Gertz 3
Affiliation  

Research has found that participation in transitional justice (TJ) is associated with increased social capital and decreased well-being. This article extends this scholarship by examining how TJ mechanisms affect the social capital and well-being of the people who implement them via interviews with 135 Rwandan gacaca court judges. In terms of well-being, judges discuss pride and confidence yet also highlight stress and trauma. In terms of social capital, many judges are now mediators and local leaders, though numerous judges have also experienced grudges from the families of those they sentenced. These negative consequences were particularly prominent among judges with more authority.

中文翻译:

过渡时期法院审判的后果

研究发现,参与过渡时期司法(TJ)与社会资本增加和幸福感下降有关。本文通过采访 135 名卢旺达 gacaca 法院法官,研究 TJ 机制如何影响实施它们的人们的社会资本和福祉,从而扩展了这一学术研究。在幸福感方面,评委们讨论了自豪感和自信,但也强调了压力和创伤。在社会资本方面,许多法官现在是调解员和地方领导,尽管许多法官也经历过被判刑人家属的恩怨。这些负面后果在拥有更多权威的法官中尤为突出。
更新日期:2021-01-23
down
wechat
bug