As a global problem, climate change requires a fast and decisive response from all nations. In order to confront the multi-faceted problem and curb its effects, each country must act boldly within its borders. In fact, addressing climate change requires a multidimensional approach that encompasses working together to mobilize climate finance, develop and implement policies, ensure the engagement of civil society in the climate policy-making process, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions at all scales. The aim of this study is to reflect the national situation of the efforts of the group of 20 largest economies, the G20 countries, using a multidimensional perspective. Country performances are investigated from the perspectives of finance, emissions, policy and legislative and non-governmental organizations, utilizing the balanced scorecard approach and the dataset collected to reflect these perspectives for the related countries since 1990. The findings show that climate related grant, funding and instruments provide the sustainability of climate actions on home ground, and the distribution of the emissions reduction is congruent with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change annex categories. The adoption of national climate policies and legislation to integrate sectoral strategic objectives and actions into a coherent framework is a relatively new and early implementation phase. The power of civil society in addressing the climate change is crucial, but their involvement on the policymaking process remains limited. Apart from this; scalable, reliable evaluation with a multidimensional perspective provides distinct results in comparison to a unidimensional perspective. The paper concludes that taking into account a multidimensional perspective on climate change makes a significant difference in the ranking.

气候变化是一个全球性问题，需要各国迅速果断应对。为了应对多方面的问题并遏制其影响，每个国家都必须在其境内大胆行动。事实上，应对气候变化需要采取多维方法，包括共同努力调动气候资金、制定和实施政策、确保民间社会参与气候决策过程，以及在各个层面减少温室气体排放。本研究的目的是使用多维视角来反映 20 个最大经济体集团，即 G20 国家所做努力的国情。从财政、排放、政策和立法和非政府组织的角度调查国家表现，自 1990 年以来，利用平衡计分卡方法和收集的数据集来反映相关国家的这些观点。 结果表明，与气候相关的赠款、资金和工具提供了本国气候行动的可持续性，并且减排的分布是一致的与联合国气候变化框架公约附件类别。通过国家气候政策和立法将部门战略目标和行动纳入一个连贯的框架是一个相对较新的早期实施阶段。民间社会在应对气候变化方面的力量至关重要，但他们对决策过程的参与仍然有限。除此之外；可扩展，与单维视角相比，多维视角的可靠评估提供了截然不同的结果。该论文得出的结论是，考虑到气候变化的多维视角，排名会有显着差异。