当前位置: X-MOL 学术Legal Studies › 论文详情
Exclusive jurisdiction clauses in international trust deeds
Legal Studies ( IF 0.597 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-05 , DOI: 10.1017/lst.2021.7
Ardavan Arzandeh

Jurisdiction clauses commonly feature in high-value international contracts. Recently, these clauses are also increasingly utilised in international trust instruments. At common law, a contentious issue vis-à-vis exclusive jurisdiction clauses in trust deeds has been whether they should be upheld in the same way as their contractual equivalents. In obiter remarks in Crociani v Crociani, in 2014, the Privy Council stated that these clauses should be afforded less weight in trusts than in contracts. However, as this paper seeks to demonstrate, the reasoning underpinning the treatment of exclusive jurisdiction clauses in trust deeds in this manner is questionable. The paper's key contention is that exclusive jurisdiction clauses in trust deeds should be enforced in the same way as those in contracts. Accordingly, an exclusive jurisdiction clause in a trust instrument should be upheld, unless the claimant can establish a strong cause why the matter should be litigated elsewhere.



中文翻译:

国际信托契约中的专属管辖权条款

管辖条款通常出现在高价值的国际合同中。最近,这些条款也越来越多地用于国际信托工具中。在普通法上,关于信托契约中专属管辖权条款的争议性问题在于,是否应以等同于其合同等效的方式来维持它们。在obiter在讲话Crociani v Crociani,2014年,枢密院指出,与信托合同相比,信托对这些条款的重视程度应更低。但是,正如本文试图证明的那样,以这种方式处理信托契约中专有管辖权条款的基础的推理是有疑问的。该文件的主要论点是,信托契约中的专属管辖权条款应与合同中的条款一样执行。因此,除非债权人能够确定有充分理由说明应在其他地方提起诉讼的理由,否则应坚持信托文书中的专属管辖权条款。

更新日期:2021-04-05
全部期刊列表>>
2021中国学者有奖调研
JACS
材料科学跨学科高质量前沿研究
中国作者高影响力研究精选
虚拟特刊
屿渡论文,编辑服务
何川
清华大学
郭维
上海中医药大学
华东师范大学
北京大学许言
楚甲祥
西湖石航
上海交大
北理工
隐藏1h前已浏览文章
课题组网站
新版X-MOL期刊搜索和高级搜索功能介绍
ACS材料视界
南开大学
张韶光
华辉
天合科研
x-mol收录
试剂库存
down
wechat
bug