当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Afr. Law › 论文详情
Judicial Intervention in Arbitration: Unresolved Jurisdictional Issues Concerning Arbitrator Appointments in Nigeria
Journal of African Law ( IF 0.268 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-05 , DOI: 10.1017/s0021855321000103
Emmanuel Onyedi Wingate, Pontian N Okoli

Parties find it difficult to determine which Nigerian High Court should intervene in the appointment of arbitrators due to conflicting judicial precedents. This perennial challenge has defied any legal solution. Considering relevant case law, this article examines the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (ACA) vis-à-vis the Nigerian Constitution. The main argument is that the Nigerian Constitution read alongside the ACA confers the Federal High Court with additional jurisdiction to appoint arbitrators regardless of which court has jurisdiction concerning the underlying dispute. There are also uncertainties regarding the intervention jurisdiction of Nigeria's National Industrial Court to appoint arbitrators. Currently, no other court can exercise intervention jurisdiction in employment disputes. This article analyses recent decisions of the National Industrial Court and argues that this Court can only intervene to appoint arbitrators where both parties request the appointment in a pending action before the Court. It is also argued that decisions concerning the appointment of arbitrators through judicial intervention can be appealed.



中文翻译:

仲裁中的司法干预:有关尼日利亚仲裁员任命的未决司法问题

由于司法先例相互矛盾,当事方发现很难确定哪个尼日利亚高等法院应介入任命仲裁员。这项长期的挑战无视任何法律解决方案。考虑到相关判例法,本文针对尼日利亚宪法审查了《仲裁与和解法》(ACA)。主要论点是,与ACA一起阅读的《尼日利亚宪法》赋予联邦高等法院更多的管辖权,以任命仲裁员,而不论哪个法院对根本纠纷拥有管辖权。尼日利亚国家工业法院任命仲裁员的干预管辖权也存在不确定性。目前,没有其他法院可以对雇佣纠纷行使干预管辖权。本文分析了国家工业法院的最新判决,并认为,只有当事双方在法院的未决诉讼中要求任命时,该法院才能进行干预以任命仲裁员。也有人认为,关于通过司法干预任命仲裁员的决定可以上诉。

更新日期:2021-04-05
全部期刊列表>>
2021中国学者有奖调研
JACS
材料科学跨学科高质量前沿研究
中国作者高影响力研究精选
虚拟特刊
屿渡论文,编辑服务
何川
清华大学
郭维
上海中医药大学
华东师范大学
北京大学许言
楚甲祥
西湖石航
上海交大
北理工
隐藏1h前已浏览文章
课题组网站
新版X-MOL期刊搜索和高级搜索功能介绍
ACS材料视界
南开大学
张韶光
华辉
天合科研
x-mol收录
试剂库存
down
wechat
bug