当前位置: X-MOL 学术Philosophical Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Manipulation and liability to defensive harm
Philosophical Studies Pub Date : 2021-04-03 , DOI: 10.1007/s11098-021-01610-7
Massimo Renzo

Philosophers working on the morality of harm have paid surprisingly little attention to the problem of manipulation. The aim of this paper is to remedy this lacuna by exploring how liability to defensive harm is affected by the fact that someone posing an unjust threat has been manipulated into doing so. In addressing this problem, the challenge is to answer the following question: Why should it be the case (if it is, indeed, the case) that being misled into posing an unjust threat by manipulation makes a difference to one’s liability, as compared to being misled into doing so by natural events or by someone’s honest attempt to persuade us? To answer this question, I first outline an account of manipulation and then use it to defend what I shall call the “Pre-emption Principle.”



中文翻译:

对防御性伤害的操纵和责任

令人惊讶的是,致力于损害道德的哲学家们很少注意操纵的问题。本文的目的是通过探究有人操纵不正当威胁的事实来影响防御性伤害的责任,从而弥补这一缺陷。在解决这个问题时,面临的挑战是要回答以下问题:为什么在这种情况下(如果确实如此),被误导为通过操纵造成不公正的威胁却与人的责任相比有所不同。被自然事件或某人说服我们的诚实尝试所误导?为了回答这个问题,我首先概述一下操纵,然后用它来捍卫我所说的“先占原则”。

更新日期:2021-04-04
down
wechat
bug