This paper contributes to the understanding of community resilience in tourism development in the destination community. Accordingly, we propose a ‘co-flourishing’ framework integrating community resilience and tourism development by mobilising six types of community capital – human, social, natural, physical, financial, and psychological – which strengthen community capacity during disturbances or crises. We argue that the existing understanding of the tourism system tends to be resource-driven and market-oriented. Such approaches neglect the needs of the destination community, which should have adequate resources for its goal of providing a good life for its members. We first review the six forms of community capital and their implications for community resilience, and argue that tourism development has a negative impact on various kinds of community capital – particularly in destination communities. Hence, we propose a co-flourishing framework which advocates a paradigm change in tourism development to cater to the capital needs of the community. The proposed framework highlights practical long-term policy suggestions for tourism development and planning. We identify further necessary research is needed to accumulate empirical evidence to better apply the co-flourishing framework in various development scenarios in both developing and developed economies.

本文有助于了解目的地社区旅游发展中的社区适应力。因此，我们提出了一个“共荣”框架，通过动员六种类型的社区资本（人力，社会，自然，物质，财务和心理）来整合社区的适应力和旅游业的发展，从而增强了动乱或危机期间的社区能力。我们认为对旅游体系的现有理解往往是资源驱动和市场导向的。这样的做法忽视了目的地社区的需求，目的地社区应有足够的资源来实现为其成员提供美好生活的目标。我们首先回顾一下社区资本的六种形式及其对社区适应力的影响，并认为旅游业的发展会对各种社区资本产生负面影响，尤其是在目的地社区。因此，我们提出了一个蓬勃发展的框架，该框架提倡旅游业发展的范式变化，以满足社区的资本需求。拟议的框架突出了有关旅游业发展和规划的实用的长期政策建议。我们发现，需要进一步开展必要的研究以积累经验证据，以便在发展中和发达经济体的各种发展情景中更好地应用共同繁荣的框架。拟议的框架突出了有关旅游业发展和规划的实用的长期政策建议。我们发现，需要进一步开展必要的研究以积累经验证据，以便在发展中和发达经济体的各种发展情景中更好地应用共同繁荣的框架。拟议的框架突出了有关旅游业发展和规划的实用的长期政策建议。我们发现，需要进一步开展必要的研究以积累经验证据，以便在发展中和发达经济体的各种发展情景中更好地应用共同繁荣的框架。