当前位置: X-MOL 学术Cryogenics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparing the predictive ability of two- and three-parameter cubic equations of state in calculating specific heat capacity, Joule – Thomson coefficient, inversion curve and outlet temperature from Joule – Thomson valve
Cryogenics ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-30 , DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2021.103288
Sina Nabati Shoghl , Abbas Naderifar , Fatola Farhadi , Gholamreza Pazuki

In this study, six cubic equations of state (CEoSs) were used to predict the Joule-Thomson coefficient (JTC), specific heat capacity (SHC), inversion curve (IC) and outlet temperature of the Joule-Thomson (JT) valve parameters. The accuracy of each CEoS was evaluated from the comparison of experimental data with obtained results. Of the six CEoSs, three-paramter CEoSs— Esmaeilzadeh and Roshanfekr (ER), Harmen and Knapp (HK), and Patel and Teja (PT)— were more accurate than two-paramter equations— Nasrifar and Moshfeghian (NM), Peng-Robinson (PR), and Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK). Ironically, original SRK showed the optimum accuracy in estimation of JTC. In addition, the Joule-Thomson inversion curves (JTIC) were plotted for pure gases. Most of the CEoSs showed reasonable prediction on low-temperature branch of JTIC, but only original SRK and PT CEoSs estimated well at high-temperature branch. For two-parameter CEoSs, the effect of employing different α-functions and adding volume translation factor were also examined. The error analysis showed that the accuracy of original PR CEoS was significantly improved when volume translation factor was included as a third parameter. In addition, the SRK-Twu88 and PR-Twu91 CEoSs showed higher accuracy in prediction of SHC as compared to original SRK and original PR.



中文翻译:

比较两参数和三参数状态方程在计算比热容,焦耳-汤姆森系数,反演曲线和焦耳-汤姆森阀的出口温度时的预测能力

在这项研究中,使用六个立方状态方程(CEoSs)来预测焦耳-汤姆森系数(JTC),比热容(SHC),反演曲线(IC)和焦耳-汤姆森(JT)阀门参数的出口温度。通过比较实验数据和获得的结果来评估每个CEoS的准确性。在这六个CEoS中,三参数CEoS(Esmaeilzadeh和Roshanfekr(ER),Harmen和Knapp(HK)以及Patel和Teja(PT))比两参数方程式Nasrifar和Moshfeghian(NM),Peng- Robinson(PR)和Soave-Redlich-Kwong(SRK)。具有讽刺意味的是,原始SRK在估算JTC方面显示出最佳精度。另外,绘制了纯气体的焦耳-汤姆森反演曲线(JTIC)。大多数CEoS对JTIC的低温分支显示出合理的预测,但是只有原始的SRK和PT CEoS在高温分支估计良好。对于两参数CEoS,还检查了采用不同α函数和增加体积转化因子的效果。误差分析表明,将体积转化因子作为第三个参数时,原始PR CEoS的准确性得到了显着提高。此外,与原始SRK和原始PR相比,SRK-Twu88和PR-Twu91 CEoSs在预测SHC方面显示出更高的准确性。

更新日期:2021-04-11
down
wechat
bug