当前位置: X-MOL 学术Australian Journal of Linguistics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Revisiting the syntactic derivation of English split questions
Australian Journal of Linguistics ( IF 0.576 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-29 , DOI: 10.1080/07268602.2020.1845608
Chengdong Wang 1 , Jinquan Han 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

This article argues that an English split question consists of two parts, a wh-question and an it-cleft. The former serves as a topic and is located in [Spec, TopP] and the latter as a comment and is in the complement position of Top. In the first part, the wh-phrase moves from its base position within TP to [Spec, CP] for the purpose of typing the clause as WH-interrogative. The second part has an underlying structure of ‘Is it X that-clause’, where X is put into focus and receives a focus interpretation and the ‘that-clause’ expresses presupposition. In order to highlight the focused X of a cleft, the expletive it, the auxiliary be and the presupposition are all deleted at Phonetic Form, thus deriving a well-formed split question.



中文翻译:

重新审视英语分裂问题的句法推导

摘要

本文认为,英语拆分问题由两部分组成:wh-问题和it- cleft。前者用作主题,位于[Spec,TopP]中,后者作为注释,位于Top的补充位置。在第一部分中,wh-短语从TP中的基本位置移动到[Spec,CP],目的是将该子句键入为WH-疑问句。第二部分具有“是X那个从句”的基本结构,其中X成为焦点并接受焦点解释,而“那个从句”表示预设。为了突出的聚焦X裂口时,咒骂,辅助BE 和预设都以“语音形式”删除,从而得出一个格式正确的拆分问题。

更新日期:2021-04-21
down
wechat
bug