This essay aims to bring to light the distinctive features of Fichte's construal of cosmopolitan right in the Foundations of Natural Right—in comparison to Kant's—in the light of the current philosophical debate on migration and global justice. The paper is articulated in three steps. First, it analyzes the addressees and content of Fichte's cosmopolitan right by emphasizing its limited scope: by focusing on those individuals who do not come “from any state,” Fichte's discussion of cosmopolitan right foreruns Arendt's philosophical theorization of statelessness and the “right to have rights.” Second, it considers Fichte's justification of cosmopolitan right—and its compatibility with his justification of private property rights—by stressing its ontological anchoring in the notions of “absolute will,” “personhood,” and “original right.” Finally, the essay considers the systematic position of cosmopolitan right with regard to the “right of nations” and the “right of a state” in Fichte's doctrine of right by giving special attention to the range of reasons that, according to Fichte, can legitimate the rejection of a stranger.

中文翻译：

---

“获得权利的可能性”的权利：费希特权利学说中的世界主义权利与迁移

本文旨在揭示费希特在《自然权利基础》中世界主义权利解释的鲜明特点。——与康德相比——根据当前关于移民和全球正义的哲学辩论。本文分三个步骤进行阐述。首先，它分析了费希特的世界主义权利的对象和内容，强调其范围有限：通过关注那些不是“来自任何国家”的个人，费希特对世界主义权利的讨论先于阿伦特关于无国籍和“拥有权”的哲学理论权利。” 其次，它通过强调其在“绝对意志”、“人格”和“原始权利”概念中的本体论锚定来考虑费希特对世界权利的辩护——以及它与他对私有财产权的辩护的相容性。最后，