As a regular reader of Science, Scientific American, Nature and The Eonomist, I could not miss how so many articles in these science-technology journals refer to micro-processing, which today dominates so much science-praxis. I have become aware that how science happens, changes primarily with a wide context of instrument changes. That is what this paper is about. Heidegger’s technologies were largely Industrial-Big, Machinic, and Mechanical. Science, today often a leader, is now operating by using micro-nano processes and has often shifted to biological and medical sciences, marking a change in how science operates. This has significant consequences for how we should think about the “transcendental” and the “empirical” in philosophy of technology.

作为《科学》，《科学美国人》，《自然》和《经济学人》的常规读者，我不会错过这些科学技术期刊中有如此多的文章提到微处理，而今天这些微处理已占据了科学实践的主导地位。我已经意识到科学是如何发生的，主要是随着仪器变化的广泛背景而变化。这就是本文的目的。海德格尔的技术主要是大型工业，机械和机械。科学，今天通常是领导者，现在正在使用微纳工艺进行操作，并且通常已转向生物和医学科学，这标志着科学操作方式的变化。这对我们如何思考技术哲学的“先验”和“经验”具有重大影响。