当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Planning Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Individuals who have zero-interest in living in carsharing-facilitating neighbourhoods: a case study in the Netherlands
European Planning Studies ( IF 3.777 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-29 , DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1903840
Juan Wang 1 , Gamze Dane 1 , Harry Timmermans 1, 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Carsharing-facilitating neighbourhood refers to a development scheme to combine carsharing, sustainable transportation-residential planning and housing features to promote less private car use and improve residential environments. Since this concept is new, little is known about residents’ reactions. This study focuses on the individuals who indicated zero-interest in living in such neighbourhoods to discuss the influential factors and possible improvements for the concept. The analysis is based on a stated choice experiment conducted in densely populated areas in the Netherlands. According to the survey results, 25.4% of the respondents indicated zero-interest. A binary logistic regression was applied to understand internal influencing factors on individuals’ zero-interest. Accordingly, respondents’ social-demographics, travel habits and present housing conditions have significant influences on their zero-interest. Particularly, zero-interest residents are more likely to be males, have full-time jobs or not work, have no child, live in medium-sized cities, own large gardens, have no driving licence, often travel by private cars or metros rather than bikes. Besides, based on the unobserved factors indicated by these individuals, several issues can also lead to zero-interest, such as objection to top-down governance, doubt of the necessities to provide shared-cars by neighbourhood management and lack of disability design.



中文翻译:

对生活在促进汽车共享的社区零兴趣的个人:荷兰的案例研究

摘要

汽车共享便利社区是指将汽车共享、可持续交通-住宅规划和住房功能相结合的开发方案,以减少私家车的使用并改善居住环境。由于这个概念是新的,人们对居民的反应知之甚少。本研究侧重于对居住在此类社区中表示零兴趣的个人,以讨论该概念的影响因素和可能的改进。该分析基于在荷兰人口稠密地区进行的既定选择实验。根据调查结果,25.4%的受访者表示零利率。应用二元逻辑回归来了解个人零兴趣的内部影响因素。因此,受访者的社会人口统计数据,旅行习惯和目前的住房条件对他们的零利率有重大影响。特别是零利率居民更可能是男性,有全职工作或没有工作,没有孩子,住在中等城市,拥有大花园,没有驾照,经常乘坐私家车或地铁出行比自行车。此外,基于这些人所指出的未观察到的因素,一些问题也可能导致零利率,例如反对自上而下的治理,怀疑邻里管理提供共享汽车的必要性以及缺乏残疾人设计。没有驾驶执照,经常乘坐私家车或地铁而不是自行车。此外,基于这些人所指出的未观察到的因素,一些问题也可能导致零利率,例如反对自上而下的治理,怀疑邻里管理提供共享汽车的必要性以及缺乏残疾人设计。没有驾驶执照,经常乘坐私家车或地铁而不是自行车。此外,基于这些人所指出的未观察到的因素,一些问题也可能导致零利率,例如反对自上而下的治理,怀疑邻里管理提供共享汽车的必要性以及缺乏残疾人设计。

更新日期:2021-03-29
down
wechat
bug