Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Navigating procedural ethics and ethics in practice in outdoor studies: an example from sail training
Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning Pub Date : 2021-03-24 , DOI: 10.1080/14729679.2021.1902826
Eric Fletcher 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Researching ethically is an institutional requirement and cornerstone of good everyday practice in conducting research, adopting a mindful consideration for participants and resisting the temptation to use methodological approaches which may exploit participants or their trust in the research process or researcher. In the context of outdoor studies and framed by Kantian ethical and moral principles, this paper describes the procedural ethics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and how our own moral and ethical positioning influences the planning for the opportunities, dilemmas and challenges of fieldwork, shaping the ethics in practice during research and in post-study reporting. From a sail training study, I describe the ethical and methodological dilemmas and the decisions made in respect of audio recording and the use of photo-elicitation; and the sense of uncertainty and unease stimulated by reflective and reflexive practice.



中文翻译:

在户外研究实践中导航程序伦理和伦理:帆船训练的一个例子

摘要

伦理研究是进行研究的制度要求和良好日常实践的基石,对参与者采取谨慎的考虑,并抵制使用可能利用参与者或他们对研究过程或研究人员的信任的方法论方法的诱惑。在户外研究的背景下,以康德伦理道德原则为框架,本文描述了机构审查委员会 (IRB) 的程序伦理,以及我们自己的道德和伦理定位如何影响对田野工作的机会、困境和挑战的规划,塑造实践中的伦理在研究期间和研究后报告中。从一项航行训练研究中,我描述了道德和方法论的困境以及在录音和使用照片诱导方面做出的决定;以及反思和反身练习所激发的不确定感和不安感。

更新日期:2021-03-24
down
wechat
bug