当前位置: X-MOL 学术Philosophies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Letter to Matter and Various Incomprehensibilities—The Effective Ethicality of Scientific and Humanistic Interdisciplinarity
Philosophies Pub Date : 2021-03-24 , DOI: 10.3390/philosophies6020026
Gianfranco Minati

The article is based on the dual concepts of theoretical incompleteness in systems science and theoretical incomprehensibility in philosophy previously introduced in the literature. Issues of incompleteness relate to the logical openness of complexity models in their nonequivalence and necessary non-zippable incompletable multiplicity. This concerns the quasi-ness of phenomena and the constructivist nature of models. Theoretically, incomprehensibility is considered in different ways, such as the inexhaustible multiplicity of the constructivist reality corresponding to the logical openness of both the world and of understanding itself and in reference to incomprehensibilities such as questions like the divide between species, cognitive systems, and after-death experience (if any). In conjunction with the need for non-classic, interdisciplinary approaches in science to deal with complexity, unanswerable questions need suitable scientifically updated philosophical reasoning in interdisciplinary humanistic backgrounds to allow for new social representations, understandings, and plausible social imaginary. Such approaches more properly allow for effective philosophical representations of the world. Knowing how to deal with these issues through philosophical reasoning updated to the current scientific levels and humanistic interdisciplinarity allows for higher levels of awareness and new comprehensive philosophical understanding, introducing new powerful social imaginary. Such new philosophical reasoning is expected to allow a conception of the world that is no longer just utilitarian, but theoretically necessarily, and not only concessively respectful of diversity with significant, even self-ethical effects.

中文翻译:

致信和各种不理解—科学和人文交叉学科的有效伦理

本文基于先前在文献中介绍的系统科学中的理论不完整性和哲学中的理论不理解的双重概念。不完整的问题与复杂性模型的不等价性和必要的不可压缩的不完整多重性的逻辑开放性有关。这关系到现象的准性和模型的建构主义性质。从理论上讲,不可理解性是以不同的方式来考虑的,例如建构主义现实的无穷无尽的多重性,对应于世界的逻辑开放性和对自身的理解,以及参照诸如诸如物种之间的区分,认知系统和后代之类的问题之类的不可理解性。 -死亡经验(如果有)。结合非经典的需求,用科学的跨学科方法来处理复杂性,无法回答的问题,需要在跨学科的人文主义背景下进行适当的科学更新的哲学推理,以允许新的社会表征,理解和合理的社会想象。这样的方法更恰当地允许对世界进行有效的哲学表现。知道如何通过更新到当前科学水平和人文交叉学科的哲学推理来处理这些问题,可以提高人们的认识水平和新的综合哲学理解,从而引入新的有力的社会想象力。这种新的哲学推理有望使世界的概念不再仅仅是功利主义的,而在理论上是必须的,
更新日期:2021-03-24
down
wechat
bug