Prostitution is a multi-faceted reality at the intersection of divergent meanings. Some feminism narratives have led to its polarised interpretation, conflating prostitution with a practice of gender oppression or an instance of personal autonomy. Framed according to legal principles, such binary has been transposed into three legal frameworks that are currently in force across the European Union; namely, neo-prohibitionism (where the purchase of sexual services is criminalised), abolitionism (where all the ancillary activities to prostitution are criminally prosecuted) and neo-regulamentarism (where prostitution is decriminalised and regulated by law). Against this background, this article will attempt to understand to what extent the legal reasonings behind these frameworks are divergent and whether the legal solutions in force are suitable within the multi-faceted realm of prostitution. Its final aim will be to posit an alternative set of legal principles able to address the contemporary shortcomings and form the basis for more inclusive regulation. By doing so, it will also seek to integrate the legal discourse with the feminist literature that the national legislators have traditionally disregarded, as well as the claims shared by sex workers' organisations in fighting for their legal protection at the international and European level.

卖淫是各种意义交汇处的一个多层面的现实。一些女权主义叙事导致了两极化的解释，将卖淫与压迫性别或人身自治的实例混为一谈。根据法律原则，这种二进制文件已被转换为目前在整个欧盟范围内有效的三个法律框架。即新禁止主义（将购买性服务定为刑事犯罪），废除奴隶制（将对卖淫的所有辅助活动都予以刑事起诉）和新规制（将卖淫定为非刑事犯罪并受到法律管制）。在这种背景下，本文将试图了解这些框架背后的法律推理在多大程度上是不同的，以及现行的法律解决方案是否在多方面的卖淫领域中是合适的。它的最终目标是提出一套替代的法律原则，以解决当代的缺陷，并为更具包容性的监管奠定基础。通过这样做，它还将寻求将法律论述与国家立法者传统上无视的女权主义文学相结合，以及性工作者组织在国际和欧洲层面争取法律保护方面的共同主张。它的最终目标是提出一套替代的法律原则，以解决当代的不足并为更具包容性的监管奠定基础。这样，它还将寻求将法律话语与国家立法者传统上无视的女权主义文学以及性工作者组织在争取国际和欧洲层面的法律保护时所拥有的主张相结合。它的最终目标是提出一套替代的法律原则，以解决当代的不足并为更具包容性的监管奠定基础。通过这样做，它还将寻求将法律论述与国家立法者传统上无视的女权主义文学相结合，以及性工作者组织在国际和欧洲层面争取法律保护方面的共同主张。