Introduction to the Special Issue ‐ “What works?” Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of the investigative interviewing research literature – Christian A. Meissner

ACP‐20‐0172: Exploring the Use of Rapport in Professional Information‐Gathering Contexts by Systematically Mapping the Evidence Base – Fiona Gabbert, Lorraine Hope, Kirk Luther, Gordon Wright, Magdalene Ng, & Gavin Oxburgh

ACP‐20‐0165: A Meta‐Analytic Review of the Timing for Disclosing Evidence when Interviewing Suspects – Simon Oleszkiewicz & Steven J. Watson

ACP‐20‐0142: A Meta‐Analytic Review of Experimental Tests of the Interrogation Technique of Hanns Joachim Scharff – Timothy Luke

ACP‐20‐0159: Discriminating Deceptive from Truthful Statements using the Verifiability Approach: A Meta‐Analysis – Bruno Verschuere, Glynis Bogaard, & Ewout H. Meijer

ACP‐20‐0139: Does the Cognitive Approach to Lie Detection Improve the Accuracy of Human Observers? – Erik Mac Giolla & Timothy Luke

ACP‐20‐0160: Validity of Content‐Based Techniques for Credibility Assessment ‐ How Telling is an Extended Meta‐Analysis Taking Research Bias into Account? – Verena Andrea Oberlader, Quinten Laura, Rainer Banse, Renate Volbert, Alexander F. F. Schmidt, & Felix D. Schonbrodt

ACP‐20‐0158: A Comprehensive Meta‐Analysis of the Comparison Question Polygraph Test – Charles Honts, Steven Thurber, & Mark Handler

ACP‐20‐0156: A Meta‐Analytic Review of the Self‐Administered Interview: Quantity and Accuracy of Details Reported on Initial and Subsequent Retrieval Attempts – Ruth Horry, Chelsea Hughes, Anagha Sharma, Fiona Gabbert, & Lorraine Hope

ACP‐20‐0191: The Link Between Suggestibility, Compliance, and False Confessions: A Review using Experimental and Field Studies – Henry Otgaar, Jennifer M. Schell‐Leugers, Mark Howe, Alejandra De La Fuente Villar, Sanne Houben, & Herald Merckelbach

Commentary – Par Anders Granhag

Commentary – Steven M. Kleinman

特刊简介-“什么有效？” 采访性调查研究文献的系统评价和荟萃分析–克里斯蒂安·A·迈斯纳（Christian A. Meissner）

ACP-200172：通过系统地映射证据基础来探索在专业信息收集上下文中使用融洽关系– Fiona Gabbert，Lorraine Hope，Kirk Luther，Gordon Wright，Magdalene Ng和Gavin Oxburgh

ACP-200-1165：对进行嫌疑人面谈时披露证据的时间进行了元分析回顾– Simon Oleszkiewicz和Steven J. Watson

ACP‐20‐0142：Hanns Joachim Scharff – Timothy Luke的询问技术实验测试的元分析回顾

ACP-20-0159：使用可验证性方法从真实陈述中区分欺骗性：一项元分析– Bruno Verschuere，Glynis Bogaard和Ewout H. Meijer

ACP-20-0139：说谎检测的认知方法是否能提高人类观察者的准确性？– Erik Mac Giolla和Timothy Luke

ACP-200-1160：基于内容的技术在可信度评估中的有效性-扩展的荟萃分析如何考虑研究偏差？–维雷纳·安德里亚·奥伯拉德（Verena Andrea Oberlader），昆腾·劳拉（Quinten Laura），雷纳·班斯（Rainer Banse），雷纳特·沃尔伯特（Renate Volbert），亚历山大·FF·施密特（Alexander FF Schmidt）和费利克斯·D·舒伯特

ACP-20-0158：比较问题测谎仪测试的综合元分析– Charles Honts，Steven Thurber和Mark Handler

ACP-200-1156：自我管理访谈的元分析回顾：首次和随后的检索尝试报告的详细信息的数量和准确性– Ruth Horry，Chelsea Hughes，Anagha Sharma，Fiona Gabbert和Lorraine Hope

ACP‐20‐0191：暗示性，遵从性和错误的自白之间的联系：使用实验研究和实地研究的回顾–亨利·奥特加尔，詹妮弗·M·谢尔·勒格斯，马克·豪，亚历杭德拉·德拉·富恩特·比利亚尔，桑内·霍本和先驱·默克尔巴赫

评论– Par Anders Granhag

评论–史蒂文·克莱曼（Steven M. Kleinman）