Historically, the careers literature, (grounded in vocational psychology) and the work-family literature, rooted in industrial-organizational psychology and organizational behavior (IO/OB), were not well-integrated, developed at separate speeds, and differed in gender focus. Early career studies targeted men's careers, while work-family studies centered on women's careers. Both literatures assumed conformity to an Ideal Worker norm. Looking over fifty years, the goal of our paper is to conduct a review in order to identify commonalities and gaps, and suggest integrative lenses for future research. The 71 studies we identified that addressed both work-family and careers issues clustered into three main approaches: careers studies emphasizing vocational psychology lenses, work-family studies from IO/OB research, and dual-realm focused research that was usually from other disciplines. Surprisingly, two-thirds of the articles were conceptual, suggesting that integration is currently more aspirational than it is reality. Most empirical articles took a trade-off lens, assuming an incompatibility between high dual role investments in career and family, which helps perpetuate ideal worker models. This gendered siloing of work-family and careers issues and the need for studies to address critical integrative problems was observed over fifty years ago in Rosabeth Moss Kanter’s seminal (1977) monograph, an agenda that our review suggests is still largely unrealized today. To guide the next decades' future research, we build on Kanter's prescient agenda, and propose expansion to four integrative lenses: Whole Life Demands-Resources; Linked-Lives of Family Life Course and Career Stages; Diversity, Intities; and Ideal Work in Changing Social, Technological, and Economic Contexts. Our agenda will help advance understanding of the pressing problems that affect the integration of employees' careers and work-family concerns, and the conditions that support the design and implementation of ideal work for all.

从历史上看，扎根于工业组织心理学和组织行为（IO / OB）的职业文学（基于职业心理学）和工作家庭文学，没有得到很好的整合，发展的速度不同，并且对性别的关注程度有所不同。早期职业研究以男性职业为目标，而工作家庭研究则以女性职业为中心。两种文献都假定符合理想工作者规范。回顾五十年来，我们的目标是进行审查，以找出共同点和不足之处，并为今后的研究提供建议。我们确定的71项研究解决了工作家庭和职业问题，这些研究分为三种主要方法：强调职业心理学视角的职业研究，来自IO / OB研究的工作家庭研究，和针对双领域的研究通常来自其他学科。出人意料的是，三分之二的文章都是概念性的，这表明集成目前比现实更令人向往。大多数经验文章权衡镜头，假设在职业和家庭上的双重角色高投入之间的不兼容性，这有助于使理想的工人模型永存。五十多年前，在罗莎贝斯·莫斯·坎特（Rosabeth Moss Kanter）的开创性著作（1977）中观察到了工作家庭和职业问题的性别孤岛以及研究以解决关键的综合性问题的需要，我们的审查表明，这一议程在今天仍未实现。为了指导未来数十年的未来研究，我们以坎特的先见之明为基础，并提议将其扩展到四个整合的视角：生命的需求-资源；生命的整体需求-资源；生命的整体需求。家庭生活课程和职业阶段的联系生活；多样性，完整性；不断变化的社会，技术和经济环境中的理想工作。我们的议程将有助于加深对影响员工整合的紧迫问题的理解。