Abstract:

“Perspectives” such as the “New Perspective” or the “Radical New Perspective” on Paul, to name two prominent versions, have come to characterise much of Pauline research since the late twentieth century. This article explores the settings of and reasons for the particular “perspectival” focus on the Pauline letters, its ensuing legacies, and subsequent impact on Pauline studies. Hermeneutical approaches such as perspectives in Pauline scholarship are more than simply heuristic approaches, so that their wider significance and effects deserve attention. Reflections on (some of) the effects and impact of such multifaceted approaches on Pauline scholarship, amidst a plethora of juxtaposed methodological approaches where primary perspectival leanings often linger, conclude the article.

摘要：

Pauline的“观点”（例如“新观点”或“激进的新观点”）是两个著名的版本，自20世纪末以来，已经成为Pauline研究的主要特征。本文探讨了针对波琳书信，其后遗症以及随后对波琳研究的影响的特殊“透视”设置的背景和原因。鲍林奖学金中的观点之类的诠释学方法不仅仅是简单的启发式方法，因此它们更广泛的意义和影响值得关注。文章总结说，在众多并列的方法论方法中，主要是对透视的偏见经常徘徊，而对于这种多方面的方法对Pauline奖学金的（某些）影响和影响进行了反思。