In his article “The Blurred Line between Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design” and his response “The Problem of Natural Divine Causation and the Benefits of Partial Causation”, Mikael Leidenhag uses Jaegwon Kim's work on causal exclusion to critique what he calls “Natural Divine Causation” (NDC). Although I agree with Leidenhag that questions about divine action can fruitfully be posed in terms of Kim's so-called Causal Exclusion Argument, I take issue with the way he attempts to carry out this task and the reasons he offers against the overdetermination response to the Causal Exclusion Argument.

中文翻译：

---

自然的神圣因果关系、因果排除和过度决定：对 MIKAEL LEIDENHAG 的评论

在他的文章“有神进化论和智能设计之间的模糊界限”和他的回应“自然神圣因果关系的问题和部分因果关系的好处”中，Mikael Leidenhag 使用 Jaegwon Kim 在因果排除方面的工作来批判他所谓的“自然神圣因果关系” ”（国家数据中心）。尽管我同意 Leidenhag 的观点，即根据 Kim 所谓的因果排除论点可以有效地提出有关神圣行动的问题，但我对他试图执行这项任务的方式以及他提出的反对对因果的过度决定性回应提出异议排除参数。