当前位置: X-MOL 学术Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Equal Performance, Different Grade: Women’s Performance in Discussion Perceived Worse Than Men’s
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin ( IF 4.560 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-23 , DOI: 10.1177/0146167221992213
Angela R Dorrough 1 , Monika Leszczyńska 2 , Sandra Werner 3 , Lovis Schaeffer 1 , Anna-Sophie Galley 1 , Enis Akin 1 , Jacqueline Bachmann 1 , Marius Bruske 1 , Ulla Burghardt 1 , Franziska Simandi 1
Affiliation  

We investigate how men and women are evaluated in group discussions. In five studies (N = 761) using a variant of a Hidden Profile Task, we find that, when experimentally and/or statistically controlling for actual gender differences in behavior, the female performance in a group discussion is devalued in comparison to male performance. This was observed for fellow group members (Study 1) and outside observers (Studies 2–5), in both primarily student (Studies 1, 4, and 5) and mixed samples (Studies 2 and 3), for different measures of performance (perceived helpfulness of the contribution, for work-related competence), across different discussion formats (preformulated chat messages, open chat), and when controlling for the number of female group members (Study 5). In contrast to our hypothesis, we did not find a moderating effect of selection procedure in that women were devalued to a similar degree in both situations with a women’s quota and without.



中文翻译:

同等表现,不同等级:女性在讨论中的表现被认为比男性更差

我们调查在小组讨论中如何评估男性和女性。在使用Hidden Profile Task变体的五项研究 ( N = 761) 中,我们发现,当通过实验和/或统计控制实际行为上的性别差异,与男性表现相比,女性在小组讨论中的表现被贬低。在主要学生(研究 1、4 和 5)和混合样本(研究 2 和 3)中,针对不同的绩效衡量标准,在小组成员(研究 1)和外部观察者(研究 2-5)中观察到了这一点(贡献的感知有用性、工作相关能力)、不同讨论形式(预先制定的聊天消息、开放式聊天)以及控制女性群体成员的数量时(研究 5)。与我们的假设相反,我们没有发现选择程序的调节作用,因为在有女性配额和没有女性配额的两种情况下,女性的价值都被贬低到相似的程度。

更新日期:2021-03-23
down
wechat
bug